*Lessons for everyone* *The woman extended her hand to me as we boarded the flight,* I closed the book and the older Malayan woman was holding her hand warmly, while

 *Lessons for everyone*

*The woman extended her hand to me as we boarded the flight,*

I closed the book and the older Malayan woman was holding her hand warmly, while

Between the ages of seventy and seventy, she was well-educated and eloquent. 

He turned to the book

Ask for a hint? 

"Is this an Arabic book?"

I smiled and answered no. This is a book in Urdu language. 

He smiled and extended his hand towards me again. 

Malaya kept talking for a long time. 

*"You are Pakistani"*

"Yes, of course," I replied enthusiastically. 

They were really happy. 

The flight was long. 

So we talked for a long time. 

*Gina* are American history teachers. 

They read *"global conflicts"* to students. 

So they are well aware of the *Kashmir issue*. 

He was very much influenced by Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Mahatma Gandhi. 

He asked me? 

"Have you read Gandhi?"

I replied. 

"Yes, I also read Gandhi's autobiography (100 years old) and studied his seven social sins."

*Jina* asked me about Gandhi's seven social sins? 

I submitted,

Pope Gregory I. 

In 950 AD, a list of seven deadly sins was published. 

He said that man has seven sins. 

They destroy lust, gluttony, greed, laziness, strong anger, envy and pride. 

If a person overcomes these seven sins,

So he lives a glorious and prosperous life,

Gandhi was influenced by Pope Gregory's list of seven sins and issued a list of seven social sins in 1925. 

What did they say? 

Until a society overcomes these seven sins,

That society does not form a society until this time. 

According to Gandhi, politics without principles is a sin. 

Wealth without work is sin. 

Happiness without conscience is sin. 

Sin without character is sin. 

Business without ethics is a sin. 

Science without humanity is sin. 

And worship without sacrifice is a sin. 

Seven principles of India

Gandhi had a social agenda. 

He smiled and slapped me. 

And then asked? 

"ﮨﻮ ﻗﺎﺋﺪﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﮨﻮ ﮨﻮ ﮨﻮ"

I replied with a smile. 

"The great rulers were practical and principled human beings."

They did not believe in promises,

So

He did not give any editorial agenda to the nation in his life. 

They keep looking at me. 

What did I offer? 

There was a difference between Gandhi and Qaida Azam. 

Gandhi was a philosopher and a practical man. 

They believed in doing rather than saying. 

So we have more examples of rules than sayings. 

I fell silent,

She wants to hear those examples in that dialect. 

What did I offer? 

For example, Qaida-e-Azam imposed lifetime restrictions,

Life is not a law. 

A lifetime of nepotism,

Bribery all my life,

Throughout his life he did not show his religious leanings. 

(Whether he was a Sunni, a Wahhabi, or a Shia, Quaid never knew anyone in his entire life.)

A commitment to lifelong commitment,

Life is not a compromise. 

Protocol not taken,

Do not eat government money. 

No taxes saved. 

Civilian, not printed. 

Did not agree on principles,

No one's rights were violated. 

And he never misbehaved with anyone in his whole life. 

They are smiling and saying well. 

He was really a wonderful person. 

I am very inspired by him. 

He stopped and then spoke to himself. 

"I won't mind if you ask me more questions."

I replied with a smile. 

"Not necessarily present in the question."

Did they say? 

"Do you love the rules?"

Did I answer immediately? 

"From the Heart"

They said

"Tell me again."

"What good is there to your rule?"

This question was unexpected for me. 

I got upset. 

And I started looking left and right in confusion. 

They realized and spoke in a low voice. 

"Just tell me what it is."

What virtues of your Qa'id has your nation made a part of itself? 

I was more embarrassed,

Sweat broke out on my forehead. 

Did they smile? 

I am a history student. 

I am also inspired by Islam. 

I have seen the Islamic world. 

Muslims are victims of two practices (hypocrisy). 

People always call Nabi as their hero. 

They also call their successors and companions as ideals. 

But when it comes to action,

So you don't "adopt" any of them. 

You don't have a good view of your ideals. 

People like Qayed Azam are also subjected to this type of action. 

You printed the rule on the new,

They also respect him on every forum. 

And you are ready to fight and die for them. 

But when it comes to being like them,

So they start looking up and down. 

So

My advice? 

If you want to spread Islam,

So, follow the custom of the Messenger of God. 

And if you want to see Pakistan develop,

So start working on the principle of rule of law. 

Your country will leave Europe first. 

They stopped and spoke in a soft voice? 

In every first class I ask students about their ideals,

When they tell their ideals,

Then I ask them if they have lost their beauty. 

What you have been influenced by your ideals and incorporated into your life. 

As most students react,

I then tell them that until this time I will not accept your ideal as an ideal. 

As long as they don't appear in your life,

If you sincerely consider your ideals as your ideals,

Then there must be their habits,

And they are (hypocrites). 

And I have never seen a hypocrite in my life living a contented and good life.*