*robbery rage* *Hamid Mir* * We had heard a lot of stories about the amazing corruption of politicians. Yesterday afternoon we had the opportunity to hear the corruption stories of a man who, who, who, who, who, for many years, years, years, years, was both a wonder and anathema to many politicians. This person's name was Faiz Hameed. *I thought that I knew a lot about the person, person, person, person, but yesterday I met three such personalities at a friend's place, and after listening to their conversation, I felt that Faiz Hameed is not the head of any intelligence agency but of an underworld gang from 2019 to 2021. were* *After hearing the stories of Faiz Hameed's looting, I had to admit that there are other places beyond the stars and there are many more tests to trace Faiz's corruption.* * A businessman present in this gathering did not say anything that was heard, but he was telling his own bait. In 2021, a false case was made against hi...
*An inquiry from the state*
what is an inquiry statement
As a resident of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, I'm bringing up an issue. I try to pose this inquiry not to the public authority but rather to the state. The inquiry is that after the suffering of Hamas pioneer Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, the Unfamiliar Office of Pakistan gave an assertion communicating sympathies to Ismail Haniyeh's family and the Palestinian public and denouncing "Israeli adventurism." This explanation of the Unfamiliar Office was delivered to the media and was likewise detailed in the media; however, sooner or later, "Israeli" was taken out of this assertion, and the judgment of Pakistan was supplanted by an unexplored world "adventurism." Restricted to.*
The inquiry is, the reason was the word Israel eliminated from the assertion of Pakistan's unfamiliar office, and on whose orders? Has the province of Pakistan taken any choice without the endorsement of the chosen body of individuals, Parliament, which isn't suitable to report?
I'm bringing up this issue since Pakistan's Unfamiliar Office and Top State Leader Shehbaz Sharif have been over and again supporting the two-state recipe for taking care of the Palestine issue for quite a while. The Administrators of the Unfamiliar Office say that the two-state equation is really suggested by the Unified Countries Security Chamber, so the interest in the execution of this recipe implies the execution of the security gathering goal. When these civil servants are requested that Israel's occupation of Al-Aqsa Mosque is ill-conceived by the Security Board goal, why don't you straightforwardly censure the Israeli animosity? So you realize that we don't make the international strategy as we are told it comes and we execute it. My inquiry is: who is the person who requested the Unfamiliar Office to eliminate the name of Israel from the assertion given on the suffering of Ismail Haniyeh?
The justification behind bringing up this issue is that a couple of months before his suffering, in December 2023, an immense Palestine gathering was held at the Islamabad Conference Hall, where driving researchers and researchers of all ways of thinking of Pakistan partook. In this gathering, Ismail Haniyeh participated through a video connection, and he said in extremely clear words that Pakistan can prevent Israel from hostility in Gaza, assuming it needs it. Clearly, he didn't say that Pakistan ought to turn its atomic rockets towards Israel, yet a few researchers probably expressed things like this. I additionally got the valuable chance to talk in this gathering, so I presented that Dr. Abdul Qadir Khan was not made an illustration of a model during the hour of General Pervez Musharraf; for what reason did he make Pakistan an atomic power? The genuine justification behind the specialist's indignation was that he was building a rocket that could arrive at Israel. And the discussion he had with Musharraf on this issue, when all is said and done, told me over and over. I had submitted in this meeting that they ought to discuss what is doable, and the main achievable thing is that Pakistan ought to make its methodology along with Muslim nations for the security of its Palestinian siblings so Israel essentially stops its animosity. Quickly following my discussion was Ismail Hania's location, and I had the pleasure of welcoming him to address the meeting. Ismail Haniya is, as of now, not in this world; however, sadly, the Unfamiliar Office of Pakistan eliminated the name of his executioner from their assertion. This implies that the schoolwork done to perceive Israel during the reign of General Pervez Musharraf stays set up notwithstanding the difference in a few legislatures. In 2019, Imran Khan was the state leader, and he was approached to perceive Israel. I was likewise welcome to a gathering where a few columnists and anchors were encouraging Khan to perceive Israel. General Qamar Javed Bajwa had recently given a preparation to every one of my partners that, in the more extensive interest of the nation and the country, the media ought to begin a conversation on the significance of relations with Israel. What I submitted to Bajwa Sahib, I submitted to Imran Khan. I said that the strategy of the organizer behind Pakistan Quaid-e-Azam in regards to Israel ought to be yours. Khan Sahib quickly concurred with me and finished the matter. After this gathering, where did I fly off the handle? I need to find out if the strategy of the Unfamiliar Office of Pakistan is as per the approach of Allama Iqbal and Quaid-I-Azam. I have expressed previously and presently I'm composing that Allama Iqbal and Quaid-I-Azam concurred with one another for the foundation of Pakistan as well as for the opportunity of Kashmir and the security of Palestine. Allama Iqbal reported the Kashmir Opportunity Development on fourteenth August 1931 in a gathering at Mochi Darwaza Lahore, and in December of that very year, he arrived at Snare ul-Maqdis, where he composed his well-known Natia sonnet Zouk Wa Shawq, which is remembered for "Baal Jibreel." Allama Iqbal and Quaid-e-Azam began the development for the foundation of Pakistan from one perspective, and then again, the battle they battled to forestall the foundation of Israel is remarkable. The All India Muslim Association began providing political and monetary help to the Palestinian Muslims in 1923. Muslim Association over and over observed Palestine Day, more than once settled the Palestine Asset. The Fantastic Mufti of Palestine, Mufti Amin Al-Husseini, was extremely near the writers of the East and the dads of the country. Somewhere in the range of 1937 and 1948, the Muslim Association upheld Palestine in every one of its yearly gatherings. The Quaid-I-Azam dismissed the arrangement to segment Palestine at least a couple of times. On December 9, 1947, the Quaid-I-Azam composed a letter to American President Truman in his capacity as Lead Representative General and dismissed the segment of Palestine by the Unified Countries, saying that this parcel won't ever be carried out and the Jews won't profit from this segment. Quaid-I-Azam was not against the Jews; he generally denounced the Zionists. The last gathering of the Everything India Muslim Association was held on 14 and 15 December 1947 in Karachi. In this gathering, alongside the division of Palestine, Zionist hostility was censured. On December 19, 1947, while giving a meeting to the BBC, Quaid-e-Azam additionally censured England and called it liable for unfairness towards the Palestinians. The Quaid-I-Azam didn't perceive Israel; however, today it has become hard for the Unfamiliar Office in Pakistan to denounce Israel. In Pakistan, it is not difficult to break the constitution; it is not difficult to preclude the chosen heads of state from the courts and open fire on political and social events; however, referencing the name of Israel harms the public interest. The inquiry into the territory of Pakistan is whether Pakistan is actually an atomic power. We have accidentally made the same mistake as Bahadur Shah Zafar. We have become the first Islamic nuclear power in history despite limited resources. This is apparently a great achievement, which could not estimate its total population and which, in 75 years, is not a fair 'free end. He could not conduct a transparent election; he became a nuclear power by investing only 500 million dollars, but this was an achievement as well as our mistake. And need financial resources to save and manage' of China. Why is there no threat to nuclear power?
Since a $34 trillion economy is behind it.
Why is there no threat to America, Russia, Great Britain, France, Israel, and India? Because behind them there are economies of trillions of dollars, while our situation is that our exports are 30 billion dollars, we get 27 billion dollars from foreign remittances, and our imports are 80 billion dollars, our government expenditure. We are also ahead of our times, and we hit another injury on top of the debt in the form of debt. We owe $130 billion, and the interest and repayments on these debts are 85% of our earnings. This is not the case only here. Stop, we are also in need of others in terms of petrol, gas, and electricity, and we need this electricity, gas. And the switch of petrol has also been given to others, and all these burdens are breaking our necks.
We should have understood this critical situation, but you see our perfection. We have additionally assembled 22 crore insane individuals, and they need to stop the switch of petroleum, gas, and power by arranging day-to-day protests. They also want to bring those people to Delhi who are sitting in Calcutta due to some expediency or fear. Who is doing all this work? They are doing it; who can sit on a horse like the Mughal princes and cannot carry a sword, and now the last question is, what will be the result? The result of this will be the same as that of Bahadur Shah Zafar: the Red Fort will be captured, that is, the atomic bomb will be captured, ten fifteen two million people will be killed, and in the end, the book of true freedom will be saved, and a person will rest his head with this book and who will be Bahadur Shah Zafar. what is an inquiry statement
Comments
Post a Comment